Part 5: The Care Home 

After exhausting every option to keep Grandma safe at home, the next step was finding a care home that could actually meet her needs. It wasn’t straightforward - far from it.. Many care homes wouldn’t take her because she was classed as high risk of falls, and not all accepted dementia patients, especially those with Lewy Body Dementia. Each rejection felt personal, even though I knew it wasn’t. It still left me wondering what happens to those who simply don’t fit the system. You can read more about this journey in Part 4: Finding a Care Home in Our Blog.

 

Eventually, we found the right care home, but it meant moving Grandma from the South to the North, closer to me in Yorkshire. I was already living there, and another family member had recently moved too, with more family planning to follow within the next 6 months. Leaving her behind just wasn’t an option. The advice had always been not to move someone with dementia from one home to another, to minimise confusion and distress, but we also knew that having family nearby mattered more than anything. We wanted her surrounded by familiar voices, not left isolated miles away.

 

The transfer was done by ambulance, and because of the distance we had to source and pay for this ourselves. The company we used were brilliant and well priced compared to some of the other companies we had looked at. Although sending her via ambulance was the safest choice, it was also one of the hardest moments knowing she had to leave her home behind as well as the area she’d lived in for decades, knowing the uncertainty of what now lay ahead.

 

Surprisingly, it started well. I visited Grandma the day after she transferred, giving her that first night to settle in. When I arrived, I was honestly shocked - in a good way. She was clean, washed, dressed, fed, and up and about walking. She hadn’t been like that at home or in hospital for a long time, and to see her like that again felt almost like getting a piece of her back. Within the first week, the care home manager even sent over some photos of her joining in activities, smiling, and to my complete surprise - she’d had her nails filed and painted. Considering Grandma never liked people touching her, that was impressive. Staff here genuinely seemed to care for their clients. I remember watching another patient biting one of the care staffs arm, he was so calm and patient telling her owe that hurts and gently dealing with the situation, never losing his temper - he was just so patient and calm. Personally I could never have been that patient especially if someone had bitten me like that and when I commented that his words were "it's my job, it happens, it's not her fault, she doesn't mean it". For a brief moment, it felt like maybe, just maybe, we’d made the right decision. 

 

But the calm didn’t last...

 

Incident number 1: Broken Hip 

A safeguarding meeting was held to review the first major incident after Grandma’s move into the care home.

I attended the hospital after getting a call to say Grandma was in an ambulance on her way there. An initial confused call led me to think she had some kind of water retention in her leg on arriving at the hospital and getting the scan results she had broken her hip! When I asked her what had happened she told me she had been hit by a beer keg! She later said the same thing to the surgeon when he came to see her and I had to tell him she had Lewy Bodies Dementia. As the care home had said she had not had a fall from talking to the doctors we all assumed that the fracture may have initially been an impact fracture from a previous fall and due to her being up and about and more mobile with the help of the care home this had actually potentially caused this to have turned into a full fracture. 

 

The police confirmed that the three allegations made by Grandma against care staff were to be closed due to insufficient evidence.

  • On balance, the professionals agreed the allegations were most likely a result of her Lewy Body Dementia, which causes confusion, hallucinations, and false memories particularly in unfamiliar environments or when new medication is introduced.

  • Historically, Grandma had made similar claims against community carers in the past that were disproved by camera footage, showing a pattern linked to her condition.

  • It was agreed that Grandma lacked capacity to understand the nature or consequence of her allegations.

  • A new risk management plan was introduced:

    • Two carers (or health professionals) to attend all personal care interactions within the care home.

    • All incidents to be fully documented and reported via safeguarding processes.

    • A robust personal care plan to address her discomfort with physical touch.

    • Consideration of therapeutic techniques and continued rapport-building to reduce distress.

  • Although the use of a camera (as had been in place at home) was discussed, it was deemed not viable due to privacy restrictions in shared and personal care areas.

  • Despite the incident, the care home had made clear progress in her wellbeing Grandma was clean, showered, dressed, and eating better, and her self-neglect had notably reduced.

 

 

 

Incident number 2: Dislocated Shoulder 

This admission occurred during her time in a care home and was her second visit to hospital since moving there. The care home reported that there had been no fall. By this point, she was being hoisted for transfers following a previous hip fracture.

Although her Lewy Body Dementia affected her awareness and understanding, her reduced mobility was not solely due to physical inability. She strongly resisted walking and did not like being touched, which made physiotherapy extremely difficult. Attempts to encourage movement often caused her distress, and over time hoisting became the primary method of moving her.

Hospital staff later suggested that her shoulder injury may have occurred during handling or repositioning. This was deeply concerning and highlighted how vulnerable she had become, and how easily injury could occur when trust, communication and physical care are not carefully managed for someone living with Lewy Body Dementia.

The hospital environment proved overwhelming for her. Changes in routine, unfamiliar faces, noise and lighting increased her confusion and hallucinations. She struggled to understand why she was there and what was happening to her, which led to fear and agitation rather than reassurance.

Early communication with hospital staff added further anxiety for our family, as we were initially given incorrect information about her condition. This made it difficult to fully understand what was happening and delayed our confidence in questioning decisions and advocating for her care as strongly as we should have.

Although the physical injury was treated, the emotional and cognitive impact of this hospital stay was significant. It became clear how quickly someone with Lewy Body Dementia can deteriorate in an environment not designed for their needs. This experience reinforced how vital it is for medical staff to have dementia-specific awareness, and for families to speak up when something does not feel right.

This hospital stay marked a turning point in showing us just how vulnerable people with Lewy Body Dementia can be within clinical settings, and how easily their condition can worsen when they feel frightened, misunderstood or unheard.

Incident number 3: Hematoma 

Her third hospital admission began when family arrived to visit her at the care home and found she was waiting for an ambulance. Staff were concerned that she may have suffered a stroke due to a sudden change in her condition.

At hospital, we were told that she had two haematomas - one older (chronic) and one recent. By this point, her overall health had declined significantly, and both her physical strength and cognitive abilities were greatly reduced.

Due to her age and frailty, surgery was not considered a suitable option. The risks were felt to outweigh any potential benefit, and treatment focused on keeping her comfortable and monitoring her condition.

While in hospital, she developed a deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which later travelled to her lungs. Unfortunately, this could not be treated in the usual way because of the risk posed by the existing haematomas. This left very limited options for intervention.

Once again, the hospital environment proved overwhelming for her. Communication became increasingly difficult, and she struggled to understand what was happening around her. Even simple procedures caused distress, and her confusion and hallucinations became more pronounced.

Over the course of this admission, her condition deteriorated rapidly. Despite medical care, her body was no longer able to recover in the way it once had. This hospital stay ultimately led to her passing.

For our family, this period was marked by uncertainty, emotional exhaustion and a deep sense of helplessness. It reinforced how complex and fragile Lewy Body Dementia can be, and how difficult end-of-life care can be for both patients and those who love them.

We share this part of her story not only in her memory, but to help other families understand what can happen, to prepare them emotionally, and to encourage greater awareness and compassion in hospital settings for people living with Lewy Body Dementia.

So as you can see once the initial settling period passed, the challenges started creeping in slowly at first, then all at once. The reality was Grandma spent more time in hospital than actually in the care home.

 

It became clear that placing her in a care home wasn’t the end of the fight - it was just a new kind of battle. Being her advocate meant speaking up, documenting everything, and refusing to stay quiet when something didn’t feel right. It meant standing up for her safety, dignity, and medical needs, even when the system made that incredibly difficult.

 

Even within the walls of a “care” home, the journey was far from simple. Not only that the costs were staggering!  Over £19,000 for just 12 weeks and 4 days at the care home, even though most of that time she was in and out of hospital. The home still charged the full amount to “keep her room available,” so she had somewhere to return to. On her last hospital visit we were unsure whether or not the care home could meet her needs and due to discrepancies with bruises as well as three hospitalisations in 3 months safeguarding and social services were still investigating and had not confirmed whether or not it was safe for her to return to the home. Regardless of this we were still charged for the entire period even though they might not have been able to take her back or it was deemed not appropriate for her to go back.